Hi all, I am looking at two petrol Outbacks for sale. Both have 130k miles on them, but one is a 4 cylinder and the other a 6 cylinder. They are £500 difference in price.
2004 Outback: 2.0 non-turbo 4 cylinder (cam-belt has been replaced), 130k miles.
2008 Outback: 3.0, 6 cylinder (has not had cam-chains replaced), 130k miles.
Wondering which one would be the better choice for reliability, maintenance, petrol, etc. Any thoughts would be helpful, thank you!