Bouncer Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 And NOT for the better.....I need to cut the ins and fuel bill of the car (95 wrx wagon) I've been offered the same year and type but non turbo, rd tax is the same but ins is less than half....but what difference in mpg SHOULD a non turbo impreza wagon be compared to the turbo. Or am I aswell selling and going for something else that's not awd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambit Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 :( Not good news but I know you are not the only one feeling the pinch mate so keep your chin up :) I would say it all depends on how you drive it and where but as a guess 28 to 30 mpg I have even had 32.5mpg from my car when it was running 360BHP but I had to drive it like a nanna in a Suzuki not so swift :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay762 Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 If you are looking for fuel economy look at some of the NA diesels and hybrids or modern petrol engines, two wheel drive does tend to be more economical as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash007ks Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 I don't actually think the non turbo is that much better on fuel if I remember, you could always look at a remap, Cost is high but you can get it mapped for MPG + Regular unleaded, mine gets around 80 miles per £20 and that's 276bhp and in those 80 miles some may be faster than others :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bouncer Posted September 10, 2013 Author Share Posted September 10, 2013 That's not bad....for £15 (2 gals) I got 50-5miles, sedate driving Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyally Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 mine is a non turbo... Clueless in the bhp tho but I get 85 miles to £20. And I've been asked if I have lead in my shoes lol. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bouncer Posted September 12, 2013 Author Share Posted September 12, 2013 It's ins too, I found out it's more than double to insure a turbo the same year as a non, I mean ffs, I know they're more powerful but not that bad, I don't think so. That's another main reason for changing, but I'd like to keep with the awd if I can Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyally Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 Wow! That's shocking.. It's amazing what the word turbo can mean. I'm lucky with mine but believe it or not my pig 206 with a 1.4 engine cost more to insure than the Scooby. 500 quid more too! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bouncer Posted September 12, 2013 Author Share Posted September 12, 2013 The word "import" goes against it too....it's a lose lose for turbo import owners, it's no wonder you can buy them (older models anyway) for buttons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggs Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 yeh imports are dearer to insure purely for the fact it's not a uk car, my neighbours 3.0 td hilux was £1500 on a quote as was a 97 import impreza, my uk turbo 2000 on a 97 plate is less than £500 a year, i was able to get a classic policy on it so that helped mpg on a sport over the turbo is dramatically better, Dogma had a uk turbo and a steady drive to his cousins would see us filling the tank again before heading back, in his sport it was less than half a tank both ways so could have done it twice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.