Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

so, after some contemplation and ongoing discussions decided to change engine options. Origional plan was 2.1 closed deck block, but decided to go down the 2.5 route.

Being a road car the low down grunt of the 2.5 will make it alot more responsive and at 450bhp 450+ftlb its gonna make an epic road engine :-)

  • Like 3

Posted

Plan b is a great alternative - you can still get cdb 2.5 options though so bhp can still be had but not as high revs vs a 2.1

Posted

it's more a case of whats gonna give me the best road car. 2.1 cdb is a couple quid more so in the grand scheme sod all cost difference, is been a choice to go 2.5. Cost would jump up for a cdb 2.5 but for a road car do you really need 500 or is it just pub talk?

 

I had 390 in my hawk and how fast it built speed was amazing, take off 200kg add and extra 50-80bhp and it will go like an absolute rocket.

Posted

 

 

I had 390 in my hawk and how fast it built speed was amazing, take off 200kg add and extra 50-80bhp and it will go like an absolute rocket.

 

Those figures / ratios are more than enough to get you into trouble  ;)  - great approach

Posted

Those figures / ratios are more than enough to get you into trouble  ;)  - great approach

 

hahaha, yeah, must be another grey type r around somewhere officer,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, lol

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Not much happening as of yet, but have got a few pics of things ready and waiting :D

 

IMAG0146_zps5ohwfduq.jpg

 

IMAG0148_zpsztgbatyp.jpg

 

Bad news is engine builder broke his wrist so may delay things a bit more :( but be so worth the wait when its done.

  • Like 2
Posted

eventually prob yeah, unless i get a straight cut ppg kit again, hmmmmmmm

 

get you thinking that lol

Posted

Nice shiny bits tidge[emoji4]

Are you going to keep the 2.5 twin scroll set up ?

Or single scroll with a 2ltr sump ?

Either way it will be a rapid classic bud, nice choice [emoji106]

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Posted

type r is single scroll, so no twin scroll to keep :)

 

combined with sc46+ there is little to no reasons for the extra expence of twin scroll, this was my old hawk 2.5

 

IMAG0166_zpsd8d33d75.jpg

 

IMAG0165_zpsbd349600.jpg

 

given its got uprated headers and up pipe, which that didnt, should hopefully pull the spool lower even more :D

  • Like 1
Posted

that graph looks great, 400lb at 3k rpm B)

 

looking at the big shiny parts, the conrods look very manly :lol:

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now





×
×
  • Create New...




Forums


News


Membership


  • Insurance
  • Unread Content
  • Support