Tidgy

The fronts fit ok, but they sit high up in a classic.

Has it been in a shunt? door gaps look a bit large

Welcome

Yeah, the stricter the rules the more expensive it is to develop. Currently you have to spend £10,000 to get 0.001% better performance. When there's very few rules a good idea costing 10p can make the car 1% quicker, innovation is the key to F1. F1 governance don't seem to have a clue how to solve the problems they are having with dropping viewing figures, but it ain't rocket science. They need to realise flat out speed won't draw the crowds anymore, its all about wheel to wheel, close racing. There on about increasing downforce to make the cars faster. I can tell you now that wont work, its an issue now due to cars not being able to get by the car in front due to downforce being lower when following a car, you need to have at least a second a lap advantage to pass at the min. They need to reduce downforce and increase the use of mechnical grip to allow that to happen.

Chuck the new maf on (make sure its genuine), do an ecu reset and see if that solves it.

Massive step in the right direction. the last bit about only upgrading when parts fail is pointless, easy enough for the mapper to pop it.

First port of call get it to a specialist, get them to give it a once over and also put it on the dyno, make sure its running alright

2.5 ftw welcome :)

Is the svx car pack or free one?

Are the updates free?

Not always visible.

Not always visible.

as above, i expect it would run like a bag of spanners and worse case take out the engine

O dear, that might explain it. When an engine is rebuilt it needs to be run in before boost is applied to allow the engine to bed in. Typicly its to let the pistons rings to properly bed into the bore. If you wern't told it needed running in then i expect that maybe where your problem lies. Could do with getting it to a specialist to get it checked out (leak down, maybe get a camera into the cylinders to see for any damage), but i suspect damage is prob alredy done :( Personally i'd be looking for a refund.

welcome :)

Tis Organe,

You say you've done 500 miles since it was rebuilt, has it been run in? aka has it been running without boost?

you do realise sniff test uses a chemical to test the water? way that reds you just shoved your nose near it lol

Check the ends of the rad for cracks around the plastic sections, they have a nasty habit of cracking and leaking. Also does it make any difference if you potter around for a bit or give it the hard right foot?

subaru seem to say that 1L every 1000 miles is the concern point, so your well over that :( When they say it was rebuilt, exactly what did they rebuild? did they just swap out the headgaskets or was it a full strip down crank up rebuild? (which on a 2.5 with headgasket failure is the only option i would accept)

Missfire could be caused by lots of reasons from incorrect plugs, plug gaps, coil packs etc given the age of the car its not inconceivable the coil packsa re giving up. What plugs went in it?

See not all drug dealers are bad,,,,,, hahahaha

My dark blue clasic got the same treatment matt. Guy had it a month and crashed it through a couple of hedges and two fields, broke his back in the process as well :o

think hell or hella or what ever there called, have a group buy on SN at the min for brake lines

As above, watch out for wheel offset to make sure they fit underneath. Other option is perhaps a set of D2 6 pots? i'd stay clear of K-sport due to dust seals, or lack of them.